Thursday, March 26, 2009

Looking for Mr. Goodbar

Well, kudos to Andrew Ross Sorkin at The New York Times for having the cojones to take a crack at defining an agenda to reform the financial system. I admire his courage, at least, because I am sure he will be the target of innumerable brickbats and sniping from the commentariat (including, natch, Yours Truly), who will cumulatively find fault with almost everything he says.

He is fooling himself, however, if he thinks any sitting Wall Street chieftain will step forward to propose a plan of his own at this juncture. Certainly Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan has the intelligence and stature—as defined by emerging from the recent financial shitstorm with the smallest quantity of ordure smeared over his person—to pull it off. But Jamie is first and foremost a street-fighting son of a bitch. He has absolutely no interest in magnanimously proposing any set of solutions which might benefit his current or future competitors. Nor does he appear to give a flying fuck in a rolling doughnut about helping Congress or the US Treasury find their way out of the respective paper bags they seem to have wandered into. No, Jamie is the kind of person who says give me the rules, then get the hell out of my way. No statesman, he.

Likewise, Mr. Sorkin's other candidate for Churchillian leadership, John Mack of Morgan Stanley, is also a bust. Having been the only Wall Street head to apologize publicly before Congress during the industry's recently televised proctology exam on C-SPAN, Mr. Mack is unlikely to seek an encore. He has done his good deed for the decade, you see.

The rest of the field falls away pretty quickly. Citigroup's Vikram Pandit has the moral gravitas and public stature of Alvin the Chipmunk, having conspired with LOLFed and his own witless bumblings to transform himself into a punchline. Goldman's Lloyd Blankfein registers even lower on the personal charisma scale than colorless technocrat Tim Geithner, which is saying something. If he weren't head of the largest and most successful evil empire since Genghis Khan, I'm sure no-one would even know who he was. And don't get me started on red-faced and sputtering Ken Lewis, who grips the helm at Bank of America. Every time I see him on TV I expect his head to explode, like one of those guys in the movie Scanners.

After those five, no-one outside of the FDIC even knows who the clowns are who run our banking system (which I bet is just fine with them). A full-page editorial in The Wall Street Journal by Bob Kelly of BoNY Mellon or John Stumpf of Wells Fargo would have all the impact of a damp squib in a thunderstorm: Who?

That's just fine by me, by the way. I think all of these knuckleheads are far better advised to focus intently and exclusively on their own knitting for a while, rather than pontificating at length about the appropriate outlines of global finance's brave new world. As I can personally attest, pontificating takes a lot of time and energy (and delivers uncertain results). For now, I prefer that anyone in a position of executive authority on the Street skip policy making and focus instead on pulling his own firm's chestnuts out of the fire and paying my fellow taxpayers and me the fuck back. And quickly.

© 2009 The Epicurean Dealmaker. All rights reserved.

Friday, March 13, 2009

The Investment Banker Speaks

Jules: "You read the Bible, Ringo?"

Ringo: "Not regularly, no."

Jules: "Well, there's this passage I got memorized, Ezekiel 25:17:
'The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he who, in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness. For he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know I am the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon you.'
"I been sayin' that shit for years. And if you heard it, that meant your ass. I never gave much thought to what it meant. I just thought it was some cold-blooded shit to say to a motherfucker before I popped a cap in his ass.

"But I saw some shit this mornin' made me think twice.

"See, now I'm thinkin' ... maybe it means you're the evil man, and I'm the righteous man. And Mr. Nine Millimeter here, he's the shepherd protecting my righteous ass in the valley of darkness. Or it
could mean, you're the righteous man, and I'm the shepherd, and it's the world that's evil and selfish. ... I'd like that.

"But that shit ain't the truth. The truth is ...
you're the weak. And I'm the tyranny of evil men.

"But I'm tryin', Ringo. I'm tryin'
real hard to be the shepherd."

— Pulp Fiction


The Dealmaker clan is on vacation next week. Based on past experience, that means there is a one-in-three chance the markets will go to hell in a flowered handbasket while I am away. Graze carefully out there.

© 2009 The Epicurean Dealmaker. All rights reserved.

We Live to Serve



Hon. Andrew M. Cuomo
Attorney General of the State of New York
Albany, New York


Re: Proposed Wall Street Compensation Rules

Dear Mr. Cuomo:

I understand that you are working with Rep. Barney Frank to design legislation which will "tie Wall Street pay to the long-term performance of the firms." This is an admirable goal, and as a taxpaying American citizen, I salute you for it.

According to the article in The Wall Street Journal this morning in which your plans were revealed to the public, you appear to be taking a measured, consultative approach in this project:
A person close to Mr. Cuomo said change is needed but the intent isn't to micromanage or interfere with the private sector.

"We certainly need to understand the industry's perspective on the potential unintended consequences of compensation reform before we finalize these long overdue changes," the person said.

This is comforting.

I believe I speak for many in the investment banking industry and the American business community at large when I say that we would find a reduction in frequency of legislative and regulatory reforms coming out of Washington D.C. and state capitals which are modeled on the trusty "Ready, Fire, Aim" approach to be somewhat reassuring. It is also refreshing to hear a regulator acknowledge the existence and risk of unintended consequences from their actions. I think few of us would object if you were to send around a brief note informing your peers in the regulatory and legislative branches of this little discovery.

* * *

As you consider a topic as charged and divisive as compensation in the financial services sector, about which every Senator, Congressman, taxpayer, and taxpayer's dog seems to have a fervently held opinion, may I humbly submit that you leaven your data collection with some input, information, and analysis from someone who—in contrast to 99.6% of the individuals offering their two cents worth in the debate—actually knows what the hell he is talking about.

Namely, me.

You could do far worse in this respect than to spend an hour or two of your time (or that of a moderately intelligent staffer) reading the posts I have published on this site over the last 15 months concerning this very topic, collected under the heading "filthy lucre." While I confess I spent perhaps an inordinate amount of time in these posts clearing away the obscuring underbrush which seems to adhere to this topic and countering the uninformed nonsense which a rag-tag collection of purportedly intelligent commentators have spewed forth in public, I have little doubt you will find a not-inconsequential number of useful and illuminating nuggets of information there which will do you no end of good.

In addition, should your (or your staffer's) desire to improve yourself extend to acquiring a more grounded understanding of the investment banking industry as a whole, you would find yourself well served by allocating a little more time to reading the more numerous posts collected under the rubric "The Life." After reading the materials collected therein, you should find that you actually know what the hell you are talking about with a far more gratifying regularity.

* * *

Having spent approximately two decades in this industry, rest assured I know whereof I speak. Furthermore, not being currently in the employ of (nor collecting deferred pay from) any financial institution in current or potential future receipt of taxpayer funds, I can confidently assert that I have no particular dog in this fight. Other than my patriotic desire to do my civic duty, and my wish as a citizen and taxpayer to do what I can to help alleviate and correct the crippling imbalances which have arisen in our financial system and spilled over to our broader economy, I have no biases in this matter. (Although I admit I will be happier if the direct and unintended consequences of your actions and those of your colleagues do not reduce the American financial system to a state of efficiency and health inferior to that of the North Korean agricultural sector.)

Should you wish to explore these matters further, I would be delighted to meet you in person to discuss them. I will make myself available on the corner of Wall Street and Broad in New York City between the hours of 3:00 am and 6:00 am Eastern Daylight Time every Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday. Should you decide to come, please bring a regulatory consultation retainer of ten million dollars in small, unmarked, non-sequential bills, plus a signed engagement letter stipulating a transaction success fee of 0.15% of all TARP and TALF funds disbursed after January 1, 2009. You or your representative should carry a clean, lightly-used Goldman Sachs duffle bag bearing an American Airlines Executive Platinum luggage tag labeled "Joe." (I will keep the duffle bag.) You will recognize me as the gentleman clad in fatigues wearing a Saddam Hussein mask.

Looking forward to hearing from you, etc., etc.

Your Humble Servant,



The Epicurean Dealmaker

cc: Rep. Barney Frank

© 2009 The Epicurean Dealmaker. All rights reserved.

Thursday, March 12, 2009

The Upside of Evil?

"Don't be so gloomy. After all, it's not that awful.

"You know what the fellow says—in Italy, for thirty years under the Borgias, they had warfare, terror, murder, bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, and the Renaissance. In Switzerland, they had brotherly love, they had five hundred years of democracy and peace, and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock.

"So long, Holly."

— The Third Man 1


Let's see. We have just come off a decade or two of greed, arrogance, and unbridled hubris which has landed us on the doorstep of systemic financial collapse. We have nearly bankrupted global capitalism by borrowing against our future income (and the income of our children and grandchildren) in order to build a culture based on instant gratification and crass commercialism.

But look on the bright side. Our modern-day Borgias have produced Damien Hirst, Takashi Murakami, and ... Flavor of Love.

Maybe we should have settled for cuckoo clocks.

1 Hold onto your Rääbeliechtli, Swissies: "In This is Orson Welles (1993), Welles is quoted as saying 'When the picture came out, the Swiss very nicely pointed out to me that they've never made any cuckoo clocks.'" Confidential, numbered bank accounts, perhaps?

© 2009 The Epicurean Dealmaker. All rights reserved.

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Tweet Mystery of Life

Ah, sweet mystery of life, at last I've found you.

— Young Frankenstein


Time wasters of the world, unite!

Inspired (or perhaps goaded) by Alltop: Economics, which has begun to run Twitter feeds of some of its most popular economic bloggers and mainstream media sites, I have decided to take the plunge and join the Twitter tsunami.

I fully expect this experiment to end badly.

I mean, after all, why does anyone who is not already on Twitter need twitter pointers to articles and blog posts (WSJ Econ, The Economist, Paul Krugman) which already show up in the RSS feeds of people who care and on multiple aggregator sites like Alltop anyway? And, frankly, I know Nouriel Roubini is an important and successful guy and all, but do we really need a blow-by-blow account of his blind taste test of Bolivian and Colombian cocaine this week? Sure, some people might be interested, but they can follow him on twitter.com or facebook directly. Spare me. Please.

Quibble though I may, however, I realize the train of cultural relevance is pulling out of the station. Now is no time to be an old fuddy duddy. I'm hip. I'm with it. I'm down with the 411.

So, as a special treat, for those of you who cannot bear to be without my searing wisdom and blistering insight into all things economic and cultural, I have set up my very own Twitter feed. It will be amusing to witness whether a medium which values concision, brevity, simultaneity, and wit will be one in which your Dedicated Bloviator can thrive. I have my doubts.

You should certainly expect far less insightful and thoughtful analysis and far more snarky, smartass comment-sniping than you normally receive in these pages. (No comments, please.) It is difficult to wrap current events and trends up neatly with a bow when you are limited to 140 characters. I realize we live in a soundbite era, but really.

In any event, given past experience, I would not expect frequent updates from me, if I were you.

Then again—shit—if John McCain can figure this out, so can I.

© 2009 The Epicurean Dealmaker. All rights reserved.